Southern
Polytechnic State University
Business
Administration Department
Table I -
Student Learning Results – Undergraduate
|
Performance Indicator |
Definition |
|||||
|
1. Student Learning Results Undergraduate A. Apply
critical thinking to the research, analysis and resolution of business
problems. B. Demonstrate
an ability to work effectively in teams. C. Recognize
and evaluate changes to diverse global business environment. D. Demonstrate
effective communication skills. E. Recognize
ethical, legal, and social considerations in business situations. |
A student learning outcome is one that
measures a specific competency attainment. Examples of a direct assessment (evidence) of student learning
attainment that might be used include:
capstone performance, third-party examination, faculty-designed
examination, professional performance, licensure examination). To help students succeed,
community colleges must both assess skills and remediate deficiencies before
students take more than 25 percent of the credits in business programs. Add these to the description of the
measurement instrument in column two: Formative – An assessment conducted during
the student’s education. Summative – An assessment conducted at the
end of the student’s education. Internal – An assessment instrument that was
developed within the business unit. External – An assessment instrument that was
developed outside the business unit. Comparative – Compare results between classes, between online and on ground classes, Between professors, between programs, between campuses, or compare to external results such as results from the U.S. Department of Education Research and Statistics, or results from a vendor providing comparable data. |
|||||
|
|
Analysis of Results |
|
||||
|
Performance Measure (Competency) |
Description of Measurement Instrument |
Areas of Success |
Analysis and Action Taken |
Results of Action Taken |
Insert Graph of Resulting Trends for 3-5
Years |
|
|
A. Apply
critical thinking to the research, analysis and resolution of business
problems. Exposure (70) to Intermediate
(80) · MGNT 4595 Business Strategy ·
MGNT
4125 Technology and Public Issues ● MGNT 4151
Operations Management ● MGNT 4115 Human Resources Management ● MGNT 3145 Legal
Environment |
Capstone and/or
related courses, internal, summative. |
Outcome=Met @ 85.5% Achievement of
average score of 90 or better on the specific portion of the following
assessment tools: MGNT 4595 -
Homework
Assignments and Research Papers Average = 78/100 MGNT 4125: -
Case
Study Analysis and Research Papers Average = 85.48/100 |
Development of
real world business strategies.
Present business strategies in the form of a paper and presentation. Use current
case studies. |
85.87% |
AY2005-06 = 80% AY2006-07 =
91.75% AY2007-08 =
87.87% AY2008-09 =
85.5% AY2009-10 = 85.87%
|
|
|
B. Demonstrate
an ability to work effectively in teams. Exposure (70) to Intermediate
(80) · MGNT 4595 Business Strategy ·
MGNT
4125 Technology and Public Issues ● MGNT 4135
Project Management ● MGNT 4151
Operations Management |
Capstone and/or
related courses, internal, summative. |
Outcome=Met @ 81.25% MGNT 4595: Team
participation evaluated through individual team assessment. Rating team members from 1 to 5. 1=Poor 5=Excellent - Average = 75/100 MGNT 4125: Team
participation evaluated through individual team assessment. Rating team members from 1 to 5. 1=Poor 5=Excellent - Average = 90/100 or
4.14/5. |
Continue with
automated team assessments. Continue detailed
project assignments and use of milestones. |
80.25% |
AY2005-06 =
85.7% AY2006-07 = 73% AY2007-08 =
84.5% AY2008-09 =
81.25% AY2009-10 = 80.25%
|
|
|
C.
Recognize and evaluate changes to the
diverse global business environment. Exposure (70) to Intermediate
(80) · MGNT 4595 Business Strategy ·
MGNT
4125 Technology and Public Issues ● MGNT 3205
Management Information Systems |
Capstone and/or
related courses, internal, summative. |
Outcome=Met @ 85.49% Achievement of
average score of 80 or better on the specific portion of the following
assessment tools: MGNT 4595: In the
skill application papers, students demonstrate knowledge and application of
specific management skills and concepts.
Average score was 78% MGNT 4125 -
Exams
= 82/100 -
Case
Study /Papers Analysis = 85.48/100 Average =
83.5/100 |
Assess student
presentations and papers to determine their ability to assess, recognize, and
recommend changes to evolving business environment. |
82.5% |
AY2005-06 =
83.1% AY2006-07 =
84.75% AY2007-08 =
84.46% AY2008-09 =
85.49% AY2009-10 = 82.5%
|
|
|
D.
Demonstrate effective communication
skills. Exposure (70) to Intermediate
(80) · MGNT 4595 Business Strategy ·
MGNT
4125 Technology and Public Issues . ●
MGNT 3145 Legal Environment ●
MGNT 4151 Operations Management |
Capstone and/or
related courses, internal, summative. |
Outcome=Met @ 85.62% /Depends on course ,
qualified for oral presentations, editing,
and citation of sources\ MGNT 4595: In the
skill application papers, students demonstrate knowledge and application of
specific management skills and concepts.
Average score was
78/100. -Written
Assignments = /100 -Oral
Presentations = /100 MGNT 4125 -Written
Assignments = 85.4/100 -Oral
Presentations = 82/100 |
Establish
benchmarks to determine written and oral adequacy. |
83.4% |
AY2005-06 =
86.1% AY2006-07 = 87% AY2007-08 =
82.77% AY2008-09 =
85.62% AY2009-10 = 83.4%
|
|
|
E.
Recognize ethical, legal, and social
considerations in business situations. Exposure (70) to Intermediate
(80) · MGNT 4595 Business Strategy ·
MGNT
4125 Technology and Public Issues ● MGNT 4145
International Management |
Capstone and/or
related courses, internal, summative. |
Outcome=Met @ 83.91% MGNT
4595: Given ethical dilemmas in a business environment, research, discuss,
and prepare a paper defining the social and economic implications, impact,
and consequences. MGNT 4125: Given
ethical dilemmas in a business environment, research, discuss, and prepare a
paper defining the social and economic implications, impact, and
consequences. Average score was
83.58/100. |
Better define
what expectations are for student performance, communicate them and clarify
where to emphasize in courses. |
83.66% |
AY2005-06 =
82.95% AY2006-07 =
82.6% AY2007-08 =
84.75% AY2008-09 =
83.91% AY2009-10 = 83.66%
|
|
Southern
Polytechnic State University
Business
Administration Department
Table I -
Student Learning Results – Graduate - MBA
|
Performance Indicator |
Definition |
|||||
|
1. Student Learning Results Graduate - MBA A. Apply critical thinking to the research,
analysis, and resolution of complex business problems. B. Demonstrate an ability to lead. C. Manage in a dynamic environment. D. Demonstrate effective communication
skills. E. Recognize ethical, legal, and social
considerations in complex business situations. |
A student learning outcome is one that
measures a specific competency attainment. Examples of a direct assessment (evidence) of student learning
attainment that might be used include:
capstone performance, third-party examination, faculty-designed
examination, professional performance, licensure examination). To help students succeed,
community colleges must both assess skills and remediate deficiencies before
students take more than 25 percent of the credits in business programs. Add these to the description of the
measurement instrument in column two: Formative – An assessment conducted during
the student’s education. Summative – An assessment conducted at the
end of the student’s education. Internal – An assessment instrument that was
developed within the business unit. External – An assessment instrument that was
developed outside the business unit. Comparative – Compare results between classes, between online and on ground classes, Between professors, between programs, between campuses, or compare to external results such as results from the U.S. Department of Education Research and Statistics, or results from a vendor providing comparable data. |
|||||
|
|
Analysis of Results |
|
||||
|
Performance Measure (Competency) |
Description of Measurement Instrument |
Areas of Success |
Analysis and Action Taken |
Results of Action Taken |
Insert Graph of Resulting Trends for 3-5
Years |
|
|
A. Apply critical thinking to the research,
analysis, and resolution of complex business problems. Advanced
– 90 |
Capstone and/or related courses, internal, summative. |
Outcome= Met @ 90%, but not meeting now MGNT 6008: Group
projects (metrics and cases) were analyzed and presented and discussed in class. 81.8% and 85.2%
respectively met the performance criterion
Group projects tend to have higher performance at the advanced level. MGNT 6090: Average for exams covering business
knowledge, techniques, and tools was 83%.
|
Evaluate student
research papers to determine ability to assess complex business problems and
define solutions. |
86.03% |
AY2005-06 = 82% AY2006-07 =
89.85% AY2007-08 =
83.96% AY2008-09 = 90% AY2009-10 = 86.03%
|
|
|
B.
Demonstrate an ability to lead. Advanced – 90 |
Capstone and/or related courses, internal, summative. |
Outcome= Not met @ 90%, but improving MGNT 6008: Students organized themselves to name their
group business and schedule group meetings. Students prepared and presented
marketing oriented cases dealing and metrics problems. Each group did complete the assigned group
projects. Only 13.6% of students failed to perform at the advanced level. MGNT6090: Average
peer rating for team members was 4.1/5.0
or 84%. |
Enhance student
learning on coaching skills for teams (consider sequence of classes if
feasible). Implement a team evaluation rubric to determine student
participation to group projects. |
86.35% |
AY2005-06 =
84.47% AY2006-07 = 80% AY2007-08 =
82.6% AY2008-09 = 80% AY2009-10 = 86.35%
|
|
|
C. Manage in a dynamic environment. Intermediate - 80 |
Capstone and/or
related courses, internal, summative. |
Outcome=Met @ 91.5% MGNT 6008:
Student performance on in class discussion of current
topical subjects this semester included the brand damage of the Tiger Woods
brand and other corporate brands, the economic impact of product portfolio
management in a down economy. Assessment of NMC in a changing environment. No
quantitative assessment. MGNT 6090:
Student performance on the class project (paper and presentation) reflected
intermediate performance on this objective.
Class Average was 99%. |
Evaluate
presentations and papers to determine students’ understanding of economic,
social, political, and global business environments. |
99% |
AY2005-06 =
85.22% AY2006-07 =
94% AY2007-08 =
85.02% AY2008-09 =
91.5% AY2009-10 = 99%
|
|
|
D. Demonstrate effective communication
skills. Advanced – 90 |
Capstone and/or related
courses, internal, summative. |
Outcome=Met @ 92.7% MGNT 6008:
Graduate students tended to deliver: 1.Well organized
plans 2.Presentations were prepared and
professionally presented In first draft
poor writing skills with inappropriate grammar. Extensive use of editorial
and personal comment such as
over use of personal pronouns, and conversational style of writing. Each
group made the necessary revisions thereby greatly enhancing the quality of
the plan and presentation. The average grade of Marketing Plans was 95.9. MGNT6090: Each
student presented his or her Strategic Plan as a paper and presentation. The average grade was 93/100. |
Develop rubrics
for use with oral and written presentations. Inform students of
resources available (e.g., videotaping) for practice. Initiate more
in-depth instruction on citations including more examples and a self-test in WebCT. |
91.45% |
AY2005-06 = 85% AY2006-07 =
94% AY2007-08 =
85.32% AY2008-09 =
92.7% AY2009-10 = 91.45%
|
|
|
E. Recognize ethical, legal, and social
considerations in complex business situations. Advanced – 90 |
Capstone and/or related courses, internal, summative. |
Outcome=Hard to measure at this level. However, we have devised measurement tools
to assess in future. Our pilot attempt overall average is 86.65% at this
time. MGNT 6008:
Students are required to write an environmental analysis in their marketing
plans which includes legal/regulatory and social issues. MGNT 6090: Ethical issues were discussed and were
included in the final presentation.
Given an ethical dilemma, students wrote an essay evaluating the
situation and articulating issues. All
students successfully completed the assignment. |
Assess a current
activity which incorporates ethical issues. Develop
integrative ethical problem statements for student response. |
Current 86.65% |
AY2005-06 = Not Available AY2006-07 = Not Available AY2007-08 = Not Available AY2008-09 = Not
Available AY2009-10 = 86.65%
|
|